Two Just Might Be Better Than One ._.

Creation... God's godly work, his perfect creations... but then, what about Evolution?
Evolution... Nature's natural work, it is still fixing the bugs in the mechanics and anatomies of all species, at least every time there is a major change in the world, but how did it all start? How did all of these organisms start evolving in the first place?

Should these two, very different subjects, be taught in the same field, or even alongside each other in class?

I believe that it would be more beneficial to teach both simultaneously in class. Obviously these two fields have their own distinctive points, contradicting each other. I think that with the blending of the two, the eyes of students will be more widely opened, in the sense that they will be able to piece their own opinions, rather than follow the cookie-cutter belief of 'Evolution is the only thing that will ever contribute to nature.' As taught in Biology.
Evolution, there is Darwin, who formulated most of this theory we cherish today. There is the proof that over time, depending on the circumstances the environment presents, species will change. However, there is the point of 'Where, in the first place, did all this originate.' Here it makes perfect sense that there must have been something to..,let's say, establish the complex organisms that we know have existed much longer than us humans have been on this Earth. The intelligent design, made by the 'intelligent designer', in the case of our society, majority of the Earth, must have been created by the Christian God. However, as many believe now, it seems that there isn't any God noticeably active in our world. So where is our God? Why is it only apparent now that Evolution is happening, what came before. And as the story goes, didn't God create all things perfect? So why is it that we see change in species
As you can see, both subjects have their loose ends to tie up, but with what to tie up? How about.... EACH OTHER!!! My idea: God DID make the world and all around it... but left, leaving everything the way it was, not expecting it, the Earth and its environment changed dramatically, although ever so slowly in our time. God is not here, so nature takes over, and as it changes, the organisms, with all their already "perfect" mechanisms, must adapt, and thus comes in, the Darwinian theory.

It makes much more sense when it is seen like that, at least for me. Then again there is always the struggle for one side to be dominant.
Here's a great song about together-ness

Ebony And Ivory - Paul McCartney & Stevie Wonder

Heat Up That Global Arguement!!!!

Samba Pa Ti - Santana

Global Warming... should the CO2 emissions causing it, be cut, even if jobs are sacrificed?
We all should know by now that our country is in a job crisis, should we be cutting those jobs even if it means cutting down dangerous CO2 emissions which affect Global Warming? Based on everything we know.. we can say that its mainly our fault. The people, the factories, government, all somehow contribute to the level of CO2 in our atmosphere. We are making weapons, making cars, using fossil fuels, and heck this is just the beginning of the list of things that we have exploited and created to make CO2 emissions so high as they are now.

I believe, that both threats, the job crisis and global warming, will eventually pass over, but for now I think that the job crisis is more important. The Earth its self is a great planet, it sustains life for us, even as we practically tear it up with dangerous gases and destroy land. Although it may not get better in our own lifetime, it will for sure heal its self. Thus the focus should be the jobs of our people. Cutting CO2 emissions would mean cutting off jobs that people are in need of.

What else to say...? You figure it out :D

The Augmentation of Arguementation

Our topic today was Arguementation... thus the title, if that makes sense at all :D
for those of you who don't know
Augment: v. to make larger; enlarge in size, number, strength, or extent. (taken from dictionary.com) lawls... w.e

enjoy this song:

Sweet Dreams - Eurythmics :DDD

Well we had a debate today, the topic: should marijuana be legalized and taxed.
I for one am against this, mainly due to the fact that rather than embrace life, the government would be willing to waste life to make up for lost money over the past years. Although I must admit that it would probably put us in a good economic standing, there is much more than that. As Sabrina said today, the negative side, there are so many more consequences that we should obviously take into consideration. There are horrid consequences that will affect the body in the long term. At what point would people that have less-than-average brain cells due to marijuana, solve our job crisis, with more of these people that would mean that they wouldn't be able to perform daily tasks that must be done at work.
Sure I'm almost positive that this would help our economic situation but based on the direction of our government, even with Obama, it seems that society and government ignores the emotional and physical well-being of the people. The long term effects would ruin almost anyone's life and probably cause someone to start becoming old with these consequences.


Bleh, I'm not so good at this

Deductive Logic >:D

psychedelic - Takeharu Ishimoto
There are three types out of the who knows how many forms of deductive logic, that we talked about today.

Syllogisms

Syllogisms are a from of deductive reasoning, containing three main components: the major premise, minor premise and conclusion. Each statement has two terms in the statement. There is the "A", "B" and "C" term. Usually the form of a syllogism is like this :

A=B
B=C <<<>:O
A=C

Example:
Major Premise: Blastoise screams "BLAAAAAAAS-TOIIISE"
Minor Premise: Brock heard a "BLAAAAAAAS-TOIIISE"
Conclusion: Brock heard a Blastoise

Modus Ponens
Modus Ponens, is a form of deductive reasoning that involves the statement "If p, then q." Where p is a positive premise and from that we can be sure that q is a positive premise and true, if it meets the condition of p.

If p, then q
p
-------------
therefore, q


Example:
If Ash catches a Pokemon, then he uses a Pokeball
Ash caught a Pokemon,
----------
Therefore he used a Pokeball

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modus Tollens
Modus Tollens is the last form of deductive reasoning we learned about today. It is similar to Modus Pollens, however, it proves a negative premise. If a "If p, then q" statement is given, and q is a negative premise, we can be certain that p is negative as well.

If p, then q
p
-------------
therefore, q

Example:
If Pikachu is sick, then he is overloaded with electricity,
Pikachu is not overloaded with electricity,
-----------
Therefore, Pikachu is not sick

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Filler-ness? Hope you enjoy the song :P

Decision....

Since my blog is titled "The World Ends With You" which for those of you who don't know, is a video game, by Square Enix...
I'm gonna post a random song from the soundtrack with every post... Just 'cause

after this post

Kk... I'm bored

:D Ran Ran RU!!!
off to read teh monster packz0rs

pUaahahahahhahahahah

So Leik Today.. I Decided To Type In All Capital Letters !!!!



RAN RAN RUUUU!!!!!!